Re: An idle thought
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: An idle thought |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1268944498.4053.514.camel@monkey-cat.sm.truviso.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: An idle thought (Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: An idle thought
Re: An idle thought |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 01:59 +0530, Gokulakannan Somasundaram wrote: > > The visibility map itself is already an example of > compression. If > visibility information were randomly distributed among tuples, > the > visibility map would be nearly useless. > > > I believe it is very difficult to make visibility map update friendly > without compromising durability. But such a functionality is very > much wanted in PG still. Surely the VM is already update-friendly. If you update a tuple in a page with the visibility bit set, the bit must be unset or you will get wrong results. Regards,Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: