Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1267789829.15738.4.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required? (Lou Picciano <loupicciano@comcast.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +0000, Lou Picciano wrote: > While I'd agree a 'make all' should, uh... make _all_, and that make > building based on lots of guessing is counterintuitive, an option to > configure like: > > ./configure --no-docs or ./configure --with-htmldocs-only > > - with some of the obvious variants - might be very useful. > Especially if docs are available elsewhere, and for those of us who > may not have the inclination to retain/host all docs for all packages > we build, or may prefer a specific format anyway, and who are really > looking for the core software in any case... But that would be a negative regression for end users, who we want to have the docs available by default, so they can read them.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: