Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12669.949377157@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Personally, I am willing to yank it all now. I think we understand the > code base well enough that someone who knows the code can go through and > quickly identify the 90% of NOT_USED that is just junk and remove it. > Tom Lane, you are the only person I know who can do this. Sorry. Moi? There are parts I understand well, and other parts not. In any case I don't have time now to make such a sweep. What I'd suggest is that we all just modify our operating procedures a little. Any time you have studied a bit of code long enough to be pretty sure you understand how it works, feel free to cut out any NOT_USED segments that you can't see any prospect of wanting again. I've already been applying this philosophy to some extent in modules that I've worked on, but I will try to do it on a regular basis from here on. If we all do it, that should eliminate the useless stuff over time. Next question is what to do about the _deadcode subdirectories. For the most part I don't even know what's in 'em ... do you? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: