Re: less log level for success dynamic background workers for 9.5
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: less log level for success dynamic background workers for 9.5 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12659.1435024062@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: less log level for success dynamic background workers for 9.5 (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: less log level for success dynamic background workers
for 9.5
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Jim Nasby wrote: >>> Anything ever happen with this? I agree that LOG is to high for reporting >>> most (if not all) of these things. >> I think we should consider having a flag for this behavior rather than >> changing the behavior across the board. >> But then again, maybe we should just change it. >> >> What do others think? > A GUC just for that looks like an overkill to me, this log is useful > when debugging. And one could always have its bgworker call elog by > itself at startup and before leaving to provide more or less similar > information. I agree that we don't need YAGUC here, particularly not one that applies indiscriminately to all bgworkers. I'd vote for just decreasing the log level. The current coding is appropriate for a facility that's basically experimental; but as it moves towards being something that would be used routinely in production, the argument for being noisy in the log gets weaker and weaker. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: