Re: pg_dump sort order for functions
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump sort order for functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1263229069.26354.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump sort order for functions (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump sort order for functions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On mån, 2010-01-11 at 10:44 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > > pg_dump sorts its output first by object type, then by object name, and > > then processes all that for dependencies. This works well, but for > > overloaded functions this still gives a random sort order that can > > produce annoying diffs in the dump. > > > Would it be acceptable to introduce a secondary sort key field into the > > DumpableObject struct that functions would fill with, say, the argument > > types (maybe something like "text,int,int" -- need to play with this a > > little)? > > I think you could probably use the existing tag field; no need for a new > one. Sorry, which tag field are you referring to?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: