Re: ssize_t vs win64
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ssize_t vs win64 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1262474448.3542.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ssize_t vs win64 (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: ssize_t vs win64
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On lör, 2010-01-02 at 16:29 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 16:23, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > > On lör, 2010-01-02 at 15:42 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> When trying to build plpython on win64, it fails because ssize_t is > >> defined differently. > >> > >> PostgreSQL has it as > >> typedef long ssize_t; > >> > >> And python has it as: > >> typedef __int64 ssize_t; > > > > What file/line is that? I don't see that in my copies. > > You mean in python? It's in pyconfig.h, line 205 (the version > manually maintained for non-autoconf platforms). The version I have > is: > Python 2.6.4 (r264:75708, Oct 26 2009, 07:36:50) [MSC v.1500 64 bit > (AMD64)] on win32 Seems kind of buggy. They shouldn't be defining it at all.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: