Re: why partition pruning doesn't work?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: why partition pruning doesn't work? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12624.1528578026@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: why partition pruning doesn't work? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: why partition pruning doesn't work?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: > One thing I'm wondering about is why in the world are PartitionPruneInfo > and its subsidiary struct types declared in primnodes.h? Oh, and while I'm bitching: it seems like there is hardly any part of the partitioning code in which the comments aren't desperately in need of a copy-editing pass. They are just chock-full of misspellings, grammar that is faulty enough to make the meaning unclear, and/or errors of fact. An example of the latter is the repeated claims that the basic partitioning functions belong to the planner. Maybe that was true at some stage of development; but AFAICS the logic in question now lives in src/backend/partitioning/, which I would not think is part of the planner. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: