Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka SRFs)

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Again, a patch is attached that clearly needs fixing.  I should have
> tested this more, but I am heading out now and wanted to get it in
> before more code drifted.

Would you mind backing it out, instead?  I've got major merge problems
now because I wasn't expecting that to be applied yet (it's still
completely unreviewed AFAIK).

            regards, tom lane