Re: Range types
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Range types |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1261002324.13414.2428.camel@monkey-cat.sm.truviso.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Range types (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 13:59 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > For example, if you're trying to do classroom scheduling, it might be > useful to constrain the periods to start and end on hour boundaries > --- but the next thing you'll want is to have it know that the "next" > slot after 5pm Friday is 8am Monday. Except on holidays. And then > there's the fact that my alma mater starts most hour-long classes on > the half hour. Data types are only a first-level constraint -- a domain of reasonable values. The class isn't going to start on a fraction-of-a-minute boundary, so it would be reasonable to reject those values early. I never suggested that next() should be such a highly business-dependent function as you suggest above (skipping holidays, etc); it should just return the next value in the domain (if it's discrete). Surely you wouldn't suggest that the ipv4 data type's next() function should skip over addresses that aren't in a valid subnet on your network. But you seem to think those make useful discrete ranges. Regards,Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: