Re: plpgsql TABLE patch

Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2007-25-09 at 22:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Personally I won't cry if this doesn't make it into 8.3, particularly
>> since there was some disagreement about it.  But if you intend to make
>> it happen, the days grow short.

> My recollection is that the patch was okay as far as it went, but I'm
> hesitant to add yet another alternative to the already complex set of
> choices for returning composite types and sets from functions. If we
> just make TABLE() syntax sugar for the existing OUT function stuff we
> would avoid at least some of that complexity, but Pavel still prefers a
> distinct proargmode, last I heard.

OK, let's just hold this item for 8.4 then.  It's way past time to get
8.3 out the door ...
        regards, tom lane