Re: SE-PgSQL patch review
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SE-PgSQL patch review |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1259695626.26322.55.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SE-PgSQL patch review (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: SE-PgSQL patch review
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 20:28 -0800, David Fetter wrote: > This is totally separate from the really important question of whether > SE-Linux has a future, and another about whether, if SE-Linux has a > future, PostgreSQL needs to go there. Why would we think that it doesn't? Maybe I haven't been following as much as I should but as I understand it, SE-Linux is pretty much the defacto policy framework for Linux. Has that changed? Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering If the world pushes look it in the eye and GRR. Then push back harder. - Salamander
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: