Re: psql patch

Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> writes:
> diff -r1.89 print.c
> 853c853
> <                     snprintf(record_str, 64, "* Record %lu", record++);
> ---
>> snprintf(record_str, 64, _("* Record %lu"), record++);
> 855c855
> <                     snprintf(record_str, 64, "[ RECORD %lu ]", record++);
> ---
>> snprintf(record_str, 64, _("[ RECORD %lu ]"), record++);

Hm, these strings were never localizable in previous versions; if we
make them so, do we risk breaking any code that examines psql output?

What about the equivalent headers in the other output formats?

            regards, tom lane