Re: Variable substitution in psql backtick expansion
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Variable substitution in psql backtick expansion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12587.1491228978@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Variable substitution in psql backtick expansion ("Daniel Verite" <daniel@manitou-mail.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Variable substitution in psql backtick expansion
Re: Variable substitution in psql backtick expansion |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Daniel Verite" <daniel@manitou-mail.org> writes: > Let's imagine that psql would support a syntax like this: > \if [select current_setting('server_version_num')::int < 110000] > or > \if [select 1 from pg_catalog.pg_extension where extname='pgcrypto'] I really dislike this syntax proposal. It would get us into having to count nested brackets, and distinguish quoted from unquoted brackets, and so on ... and for what? It's not really better than \if sql select 1 from pg_catalog.pg_extension where extname='pgcrypto' (ie, "\if sql ...text to send to server..."). If you're worried about shaving keystrokes, make the "select" be implicit. That would be particularly convenient for the common case where you're just trying to evaluate a boolean expression with no table reference. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: