Re: UTF8 with BOM support in psql
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: UTF8 with BOM support in psql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1258403827.21773.9.camel@vanquo.pezone.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: UTF8 with BOM support in psql (Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: UTF8 with BOM support in psql
Re: UTF8 with BOM support in psql Re: UTF8 with BOM support in psql |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On ons, 2009-10-21 at 13:11 +0900, Itagaki Takahiro wrote: > Sure. Client encoding is declared in body of a file, but BOM is > in head of the file. So, we should always ignore BOM sequence > at the file head no matter what client encoding is used. > > The attached patch replace BOM with while spaces, but it does not > change client encoding automatically. I think we can always ignore > client encoding at the replacement because SQL command cannot start > with BOM sequence. If we don't ignore the sequence, execution of > the script must fail with syntax error. OK, I think the consensus here is: - Eat BOM at beginning of file (as you implemented) - Only when client encoding is UTF-8 --> please fix that I'm not sure if replacing a BOM by three spaces is a good way to implement "eating", because it might throw off a column indicator somewhere, say, but I couldn't reproduce a problem. Note that the U +FEFF character is defined as *zero-width* non-breaking space.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: