> On 1 Sep 2025, at 07:27, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
> I suggest that instead of adding the context to the Port structure, make a separate context struct for this purpose,
forexample:
Fair enough, done in the attached.
> This seems like an extremely inconvenient solution, as can be seen by the amount of changes your patch introduces.
Wecould just make errbuf thread-local and be done, without having to change the API. (This is how glibc's strerror()
worksinternally.)
I assume you mean simply leaving it be for now awaiting more thread primitives
to be added to fully support thread local storage? (sidenote; if our thread
local store code will use TLS then be-secure-openssl.c will be challenging to
read =)).
I've left out this portion in the attached and only left the callback private
data change.
--
Daniel Gustafsson