Re: strange IS NULL behaviour
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: strange IS NULL behaviour |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12574.1378258994@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: strange IS NULL behaviour (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: strange IS NULL behaviour
Re: strange IS NULL behaviour |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > This has made me adjust my goal and change it so SELECT ROW(NULL) IS > NULL returns true, and any further nesting returns false. AFAICS, the only good argument for breaking backwards compatibility here is if you can convince people that the new behavior is more conformant to the SQL spec. Where's the chapter and verse that argues for this interpretation? And I will say once more that a patch that affects only the behavior of eval_const_expressions can be rejected on its face. That code has to be kept in sync with the behavior of execQual.c, not just whacked around by itself. And then there are the NOT NULL constraint cases to worry about. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: