Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1256119065.12996.0.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 20:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > So I went to see about making the changes to remove regex_flavor, and > was astonished to find that all the regex-related functions are already > marked immutable, and AFAICS always have been. This is clearly wrong, > and we would have to fix it if we weren't about to remove the GUC. > (In principle we should advise people to change the markings in existing > databases, but given the lack of complaints it's probably not worth the > trouble --- I doubt many applications change regex_flavor on the fly.) Are you sure this wasn't intentional, because it breaks performance and we doubted that many applications would change regex_flavor on the fly?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: