Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12539.1069429920@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing) (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > The one problem with the signal approach is how long does the system > wait before giving up on the app shutdown? Seems that should be > something controllable by the admin, but without shutdown scripts, it > isn't. I believe 20 seconds is the standard number --- that's plenty for Postgres. (I know that it is about 20 seconds on OS X, because that's how much time tended to get added to the shutdown procedure back when OS X 10.0 had that shutdown bug that prevented the postmaster from forking a shutdown subprocess.) The fact that the number isn't readily configurable is indeed a PITA. In a previous lifetime I ran a data-collection application that needed more than 20 seconds to shut down, and so would not exit cleanly if you didn't have a shutdown script step that would wait for it. But I don't see it as a problem for Postgres. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: