On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 07:57 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sep 3, 2009, at 7:44 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> > The SQL standard specifies that a trigger is fired if the column is
> > mentioned in the UPDATE statement, independent of whether the value is
> > actually changed through the update.
>
> That is thorougly bizarre, IMO.
Well, if you find that bizarre, consider the existing behavior: Why
should an ON UPDATE row trigger fire when none of the values of the
row's columns actually change? I think if you read
TRIGGER ON UPDATE
as
TRIGER ON UPDATE OF <all columns>
then it makes some sense.