Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )
Дата
Msg-id 1250377323.9960.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Ответы Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On fre, 2009-08-14 at 13:57 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> Looking at the definitions of vacuum_freeze_min_age and
> autovacuum_freeze_max_age there seems to be almost no distinction
> between "min" and "max" in those two names.

For min, the action happens at or above the min values.  For max, the
action happens at or below the max value.

With those two particular parameters, the freezing happens exactly
between the min and the max value.




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove tabs from SGML.