Re: buildfarm + meson
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: buildfarm + meson |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 124b4492-e4c9-2f7d-cd54-de09c05dbde5@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: buildfarm + meson (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: buildfarm + meson
Re: buildfarm + meson |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At this stage I think I'm prepared to turn this loose on a couple of my buildfarm animals, and if nothing goes awry for the remainder of the month merge the dev/meson branch and push a new release.
There is still probably a little polishing to do, especially w.r.t. log file artefacts.
A few things I've found:
. We don't appear to have an equivalent of the headerscheck and cpluspluscheck GNUmakefile targets
. I don't know how to build other docs targets (e.g. postgres-US.pdf)
. There appears to be some mismatch in database names (e.g. regression_dblink vs contrib_regression_dblink). That's going to cause some issues with the module that adjusts things for cross version upgrade.
cheers
andrew
-- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: