Re: SHOW TABLES
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SHOW TABLES |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 124981C3-5196-4961-9A67-F305CB851A49@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SHOW TABLES ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SHOW TABLES
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Jul 15, 2010, at 10:50 AM, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 17:38 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >>> Looks like the last time this was discussed, there wasn't any clear >>> conclusion. Someone created a patch and it's still on the TODO list: >>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-01/msg01845.php >> >> That one is about: >> a) doing it in psql., not the backend >> b) not actually implementing the command, but implementing hints for >> the user telling them which is the correct command >> >> Is there an actual common use-case for having these commands available >> for *non-psql* interfaces? > > Yes. We should provide a single, well described grammar for interacting > with objects in the database regardless of client. I should be able to > open ANY SQL terminal, and type SHOW ME THE MONEY and have Benjamins > fall out. Damn straight. I like \d as well as anyone but there are real problems with it. Perhaps when we add \dxrvbfqS$: we'll stopto reflect on what they are. Having said that, I want to urge that we spend a suitable amount of time and thought and care designing this, lest it turninto a mess. I have no interest in slamming something through without adequate consideration. ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: