Re: location of Unix socket
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: location of Unix socket |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12477.975360009@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: location of Unix socket (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: location of Unix socket
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > I don't like the code in fe-connect.c one bit, it's way messed up. Yes. We've accepted several extremely questionable (not to mention poorly documented or completely undocumented) "features" in there recently. If I'd been paying more attention I would've voted against both the URL patch and the SERVICE patch, as I think they're both less than fully baked --- and I don't see word one about either in the libpq SGML documentation. Someone should probably review the history and either fix or remove the more dubious patches, before we get stuck having to be backwards-compatible with bad ideas. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: