Re: Call stacks and RAISE INFO
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Call stacks and RAISE INFO |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12475.1318691636@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Call stacks and RAISE INFO (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Call stacks and RAISE INFO
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes: > 2011/10/15 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>: >> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I have no problem with this. A context can be false for info and true >>> for other in default. Please, use a different identifier than >>> "context", that can be use for reading context in future - maybe >>> "attach_context" or some similar. >> error_context? > what about show_context, hide_context, hold_context, use_context ?? I still think it should be CONTEXT, period. All the other options to RAISE are named directly after the message lines they control; why should this one be different? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: