Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> I was going to add one for schemas, but \ds and \dS are already taken,
>> and there was no good proposal for what to use instead. Any thoughts?
> \dschema
I would have done that, but it doesn't fit nicely beside the behavior
of the \d[istvS] family. Maybe we should retire that thing?
regards, tom lane