Re: New version numbering practices
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New version numbering practices |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1246.1470438158@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New version numbering practices (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > One hiccup I found is that server_version_num is not sent to clients. > Instead, libpq assembles the numeric version number itself from the > string version, and it will fail if it sees only one number (e.g., > 10devel). It will then set the version number to 0 for "unknown". Per discussion, I applied and back-patched the libpq/fe-exec.c part of this, so that back-branch clients will have a decent chance of understanding the new server_version format by the time it hits the field. In a quick look around, it seemed like we might also want to fix and back-patch the server version printing logic in psql's connection_warnings() function. However that would involve touching a translatable string so I thought it best not to do it just before back-branch releases. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: