Re: Performance issues with custom functions
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance issues with custom functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12437.1130368717@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Performance issues with custom functions ("Edward Di Geronimo Jr." <edigeronimo@xtracards.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Performance issues with custom functions
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
"Edward Di Geronimo Jr." <edigeronimo@xtracards.com> writes: > ... I'd like to know exactly what causes > the bottleneck in the original query, and if there are other approaches > to solving the issue in case I need them in future queries. This is fairly hard to read ... it would help a lot if you had shown the view definitions that the query relies on, so that we could match up the plan elements with the query a bit better. However, I'm thinking the problem is with this IN clause: > where pl.network_id in (select ns.network_id > from development.network_state ns > where ns.from_date < current_time > and (ns.thru_date > current_time or > ns.thru_date is null) > and (ns.state_cd = pl.state_cd or ns.state_cd='') > ) Because the sub-SELECT references pl.state_cd (an outer variable reference), there's no chance of optimizing this into a join-style IN. So the sub-SELECT has to be re-executed for each row of the outer query. BTW, it's not apparent to me that your "flattened" query gives the same answers as the original. What if a pl row can join to more than one row of the ns output? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: