Re: wCTE: about the name of the feature
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: wCTE: about the name of the feature |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12432.1298565458@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: wCTE: about the name of the feature (Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi>) |
Ответы |
Re: wCTE: about the name of the feature
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi> writes: > On 2011-02-24 6:20 PM +0200, Tom Lane wrote: >> The best idea I have at the moment is to spell out "data modifying >> command" (or "statement") rather than relying on the acronym. >> In the code, we could change hasDmlWith to hasModifyingWith, for >> example. The error messages could read like >> data-modifying statement in WITH is not allowed in a view >> >> Comments? > Out of everything suggested so far, I think this is the best we have, if > we can fit the whole thing into out error messages. Quickly grepping > through the patch suggests that we can, at least for the cases in the > current patch. > I also prefer "statement" over "command". OK, I will make those adjustments. Are you going to do more work on the documentation part of the patch? I can stick to working on the code part meanwhile, if you are. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: