postmaster dead on startup from unportable SSL patch
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | postmaster dead on startup from unportable SSL patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12430.938660668@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] postmaster dead on startup from unportable SSL patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Someone had the bright idea that the postmaster's -i switch could be redefined as -i same as it ever was -is accept only SSL connections Unfortunately, implementing that requires a getopt() that understands the GNU double-colon extension ("i::"). HPUX's getopt, which claims to be fully conformant to POSIX.2 and about six other standards, doesn't grok it. Net result: postmaster is quitting on startup with a "usage" message for me. Doubtless it will also fail on most other non-GNU-libc platforms. Unless we want to get into the business of supplying a substitute optarg() library routine, we're going to have to pick a more portable switch syntax for SSL. (I might also point out that "-is" used to have a quite different interpretation, ie "-i -s", which could trip up someone somewhere.) I can see two reasonable choices: (a) pick a currently-unused switch letter that you specify *in addition to* -i, if you want only secure connections; (b) pick a currently-unused switch letter that you specify *instead of* -i, if you want only secure connections. I'd lean towards (a) except that both of the obvious choices, -s and -S, are already taken. If we go with (b), -I is available and perhaps not a totally off-the-wall choice, but I can't say I really like it. Comments? Ideas? Is it time to give up on getopt and go to multiletter switch names? (Of course that would break a lot of people's startup scripts... but we may someday be forced into it... maybe it's better to bite the bullet now.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: