Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12421.1074787470@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5? (Cott Lang <cott@internetstaff.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Cott Lang <cott@internetstaff.com> writes: > However, unless I am mistaken, a baseline backup would need to be taken > cold because you cannot take a consistent online backup of the data > files without using file system snapshots or split mirrors, and even > that's questionable. No, it wouldn't. All you need is to archive WAL beginning from the last checkpoint record before you begin to take the baseline backup. The baseline backup would not be consistent in itself --- but replaying WAL from the previous checkpoint to any time later than the end of the backup would bring it to a consistent state. Missed updates in the backup are essentially damage that would get repaired by replay. There are a few trivial things that still have to be done before this can be a reality (one I can think of is that WAL really needs to have entries for file creation/deletion), but it's not that far off in terms of the base mechanisms. Writing the management software is the main task. There is a lot more info available in the pghackers archives. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: