Re: Patch to fix search_path defencies with pg_bench
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch to fix search_path defencies with pg_bench |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1241715203.11534.39.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch to fix search_path defencies with pg_bench (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch to fix search_path defencies with pg_bench
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 12:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Well, pgbench has been coded this way since forever and we've only seen > this one report of trouble. Still, I can't object very hard to renaming > the tables to pgbench_accounts etc --- it's a trivial change and the > only thing it could break is custom pgbench scenarios that rely on the > default scenario's tables, which there are probably not many of. > > So do we have consensus on dropping the "SET search_path" and renaming > the tables? +1 (I hate prefixed table names but I get the idea) Joshua D. Drake > > regards, tom lane > -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: