Re: The reasoning behind having several features outside
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The reasoning behind having several features outside |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12416.1099166842@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The reasoning behind having several features outside ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes: > On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 nd02tsk@student.hig.se wrote: >> Replication is one subsystem not included in source tree. But PostgreSQL >> has other subsystems that are included such as plugins for procedural >> languages. So isn't the same risks involved with them? > Yes, which is why you will find that several of them are 'outside > projects' for development purposes ... We have been trying to "push out" anything that is not fairly tightly tied to the core backend, enough so that it's easier to maintain with the backend than separately. The PL languages are in a gray area, but for the most part it seems better to treat them as part of the core for maintenance purposes. They tend to need fixed whenever we make any changes to internal backend APIs. (See for instance discussion just now in pghackers with Thomas Hallgren --- if PL/Java had been part of the core distro then he'd not now be playing catchup to make it work with 8.0 CVS tip...) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: