Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS
От | Zdenek Kotala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1240500739.1275.55.camel@localhost обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS
Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane píše v čt 23. 04. 2009 v 11:11 -0400: > Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes: > > I hit a problem with libtcl.so that LDFLAGS is not propagated. The same > > problem is with other PL languages as well. > > > Is it intention or a bug? > > It's intentional; LDFLAGS is for linking executables and may not be > suitable for shlibs. I see that Makefile.shlib makes exceptions for > some platforms though. What *specific* problem are you having, on what > platform? I have problem with setup builfarm member on Solaris 10. I need to pass -R<path> (rpath). I can do it by LD_OPTIONS as we do it for package building. I had only doubt if it is correct behavior. however it seems to me that $rpath should be set like --with-libs, but it look likes that it does not work. Thanks Zdenek
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: