Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1240429995.2119.102.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 15:49 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > Warning about very old prepared transactions is something that we > could think about doing as well; it doesn't have to be either-or. > I think the need for it would decrease quite a bit if they weren't > enabled by default, though. > > Comments? Anyone seriously opposed to making the default be zero? I am not opposed to making the default zero. I am also +1 on adding the warnings. Joshua D. Drake > > regards, tom lane > -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: