Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1239702548.16396.97.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert (alvherre@postgresql.org (Alvaro Herrera)) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple
jobs", so partly revert
Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert |
Список | pgsql-committers |
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 00:06 +0000, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Log Message: > ----------- > pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert the > previous patch. I notice that the release notes talk about "parallel restore", yet the word parallel is not used in the docs anywhere. The section on restoring a dump makes no mention of this new facility, nor does the perf tips section. Also says that the option doesn't work with --single-transaction, so we should say that you've added in TRUNCATE to make the COPY go faster (or haven't you? I know we discussed it). -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: