Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1236619613.4649.26.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 12:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@endpoint.com> writes: > > The solution I came up with is to use a new letter, -I, and to deprecate -d by > > having it throw an exception when used. > > "Deprecate" does not mean "break". Sorry Tom. Greg is correct here although I disagree with his wording. It should be removed and if someone passes -d it should throw an ERROR that says something like: ERROR: -d has been replaced by -I Greg and I are both in the field and the field consistently uses -d in the wrong way. Joshua D. Drake > > regards, tom lane > -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: