Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1235496972.16176.163.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches
Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 00:51 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 3:47 PM, K, Niranjan (NSN - IN/Bangalore) > <niranjan.k@nsn.com> wrote: > > Could you please let me know what are the outstanding features that are still to be developed in the respective patches? > > > > I'am currently referring the wiki: "Todo and Claim" for NTT and for HotStandby, i see that almost all issues are closed.Are there any features / refactoring / bugs still need to be fixed. > > At least I'm planning to work on the following two items of Synch Rep for v8.5. > Of course, Synch Rep works fine without these features. > - Add new feature which transfers all WAL records via the direct connection > between the primary and the standby. In other words, get rid of > file-based log shipping part from the patch. > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/496B9495.4010902@enterprisedb.com Please bear in mind my strong objection to this. Attempting to transfer all data via a single connection destroys VLDB usage of this feature. So for me its just additional code for ease-of-use in the simplest case, not code replacement. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: