Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: 8.4 release planning)
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: 8.4 release planning) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1233253508.20951.81.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: 8.4 release planning) (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: 8.4 release planning)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 10:18 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: > All, > > Thing is, our review/commit process is so peculiar to our project that > using *any* prebuilt solution would require us to change our process to > support the tool. And I can't imagine this group doing that. I am not sure I agree with this. Someone submits patchticket is createdreviewer takes ticketcomments submitter takes ticketfixes based on comments review takes ticketapproves if reviewer is a committers, he commits. if reviewer isn't he set the ticket to "need final review" tickets that are in that state are reviewed by commiters. Sounds like standard stuff to me. Joshua D. Drake > > --Josh > -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: