Re[4]: Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog.c
| От | Xu Yifeng |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re[4]: Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog.c |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 12317578146.20010227134544@telekbird.com.cn обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Re[2]: Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog.c (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re[4]: Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog.c
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Tom, Tuesday, February 27, 2001, 12:45:18 PM, you wrote: TL> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: >> I know it is easy for you, but the number of reports and problems we >> hear about shows it is an issue for some. TL> We hear some reports, but not a lot. We have no idea whatever what TL> problems might ensue if we used mmap instead. I'm dubious that SysV TL> shmem creates enough problems to justify replacing it with a solution TL> of essentially unknown portability characteristics... TL> regards, tom lane could anyone investigate mmap() in many modern UNIX systems to prove that mmap() is so un-portable? it seems mmap() is a portable problem like you said, but I think SYSV shmem for PGSQL is a installation problem. you push some difficults to end user, and take easy taskes for yourself. Xu Yifeng
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: