Re: Why do we define HAVE_GSSAPI_EXT_H?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why do we define HAVE_GSSAPI_EXT_H? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1228648.1720479932@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Why do we define HAVE_GSSAPI_EXT_H? (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why do we define HAVE_GSSAPI_EXT_H?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > configure/meson define HAVE_GSSAPI_EXT_H / HAVE_GSSAPI_GSSAPI_EXT_H - but > afaict we don't use those anywhere? It looks to me like it's just a byproduct of the autoconf macros we use to verify that you have a sane installation: if test "$with_gssapi" = yes ; then AC_CHECK_HEADERS(gssapi/gssapi.h, [], [AC_CHECK_HEADERS(gssapi.h, [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([gssapi.h header file is required for GSSAPI])])]) AC_CHECK_HEADERS(gssapi/gssapi_ext.h, [], [AC_CHECK_HEADERS(gssapi_ext.h, [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([gssapi_ext.h header file is required for GSSAPI])])]) fi There might be a variant of AC_CHECK_HEADERS that doesn't have the default define-a-symbol action, not sure. Maybe it's not really necessary to check both gssapi.h and gssapi_ext.h, but I'm not very familiar with all the variants of GSSAPI that are out there. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: