Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: What's going on with pgfoundry? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1227736859.9359.201.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: What's going on with pgfoundry? (Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 13:57 -0800, Steve Crawford wrote: > David Fetter wrote: > > > > > > We should move to a port-knocking > > <http://dotancohen.com/howto/portknocking.html> or other modern > > strategy if we're going to move at all. > > > > > Yeah, but telling my firewall to move port 22 inside to port xxxx > outside took less time than writing this email. Inside the firewall > plain old ssh continues to work fine and I don't have to deal with > issues of forwarding additional ports through the firewall, mucking with > iptables rules, etc. > > For my servers, moving outside access to a non-standard port has proven > 100% effective for over a year so additional complexity hasn't been > warranted. Since were chatting :P. My vote would be to move everything back to port 22 and force key based auth only. Joshua D. Drake > > Cheers, > Steve > > -- PostgreSQL Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company,serving since 1997
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: