Re: Bad performance on simple query
От | Dimi Paun |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bad performance on simple query |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1226945654.5760.106.camel@dimi.lattica.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bad performance on simple query ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bad performance on simple query
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 10:40 -0700, Scott Marlowe wrote: > I'm guessing a fair bit of that time is pgadminIII prettifying the > output for you, etc. I.e. it's not all transfer time. Hard to say > without hooking some kind of profiler in pgadminIII. Is psql running > local and pgadminIII remotely? Or are they both remote? If both psql > and pgadminIII are remote (i.e. same basic circumstances) then it's > got to be a difference in the client causing the extra time. OR is > this output of explain analyze? With \timing on I get basically the same output (local vs remote) in psql (0.668ms vs. 0.760ms). More like it. WTH is pgadminIII reporting?!? -- Dimi Paun <dimi@lattica.com> Lattica, Inc.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: