Re: Rethinking opclass member checks and dependency strength
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Rethinking opclass member checks and dependency strength |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1221226.1595951024@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Rethinking opclass member checks and dependency strength (Hamid Akhtar <hamid.akhtar@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Rethinking opclass member checks and dependency strength
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hamid Akhtar <hamid.akhtar@gmail.com> writes:
> I've gone through the patch and applied on the master branch, other than a few hunks, and whether as suggested
upthread,the default case for "switch (op->number)" should throw an error or not, I found that bloom regression is
crashing.
> -------------
> test bloom ... FAILED (test process exited with exit code 2) 20 ms
Hmm ... I think you must have done something wrong. For me,
am-check-members-callback-5.patch still applies cleanly (just a few
small offsets), and it passes that test as well as the rest of
check-world. The cfbot agrees [1].
Maybe you didn't "make clean" before rebuilding?
regards, tom lane
[1] https://travis-ci.org/github/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/builds/712599990
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: