Re: Restore fails if using multiple threads and database is dumped through pipe
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Restore fails if using multiple threads and database is dumped through pipe |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12160.1579535943@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Restore fails if using multiple threads and database is dumpedthrough pipe (Joni Ruuskanen <joni.ruuskanen@likeit.fi>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
Joni Ruuskanen <joni.ruuskanen@likeit.fi> writes: > After upgrading from Postgresql 11 to 12 I noticed pg_restore fails if -j / jobs parameter is specified and database isdumped through pipe. > This doesn't happen if dump is saved through redirect (for example: > file.dmp) or file parameter (-f). > Is this intended behaviour? > Dump to file via stdout: pg_dump -Fc dumptest > dumptest-stdout.dmp > Restore: pg_restore -j4 -d dumptest -O -Fc --role=tomcat dumptest-stdout.dmp > No errors > Dump to file via pipe: pg_dump -Fc dumptest | tee dumptest-pipe.dmp >/dev/null > Restore: pg_restore -j4 -d dumptest -O -Fc --role=tomcat dumptest-pipe.dmp > pg_restore: error: could not find block ID 5648 in archive -- possibly due to out-of-order restore request, which cannotbe handled due to lack of data offsets in archive Yes, if you don't write directly to the output file then pg_dump has no way to seek in the file, so it can't go back and fill in the data offsets in the table of contents after it finishes dumping the tables. pg_restore can cope with the lack of information as long as it's doing a simple serial restore; but in parallel mode, not so much. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: