Re: Date vs Timestamp without timezone Partition Key
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Date vs Timestamp without timezone Partition Key |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 12135.1590382103@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Date vs Timestamp without timezone Partition Key (Cedric Leong <cedricleong@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Date vs Timestamp without timezone Partition Key
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Cedric Leong <cedricleong@gmail.com> writes:
> Just in case someone is interested enough to answer this. Does anyone know
> if the performance for a date column vs a timestamp column as a partition
> key is large?
I doubt it's even measurable, at least on 64-bit machines. You're
basically talking about 32-bit integer comparisons vs 64-bit integer
comparisons.
On a 32-bit machine it's possible that an index on a date column
will be physically smaller, so you could get some wins from reduced
I/O. But on (most?) 64-bit machines that difference goes away too,
because of alignment restrictions.
As always, YMMV; it never hurts to do your own testing.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: