Re: Overhauling GUCS

On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 20:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:

> Actually, the reason it's still 10 is that the effort expended to get it
> changed has been *ZERO*.  I keep asking for someone to make some
> measurements, do some benchmarking, anything to make a plausible case
> for a specific higher value as being a reasonable place to set it.

> The silence has been deafening.

Not surprising really. It is a simple adjustment to make and it also is
easy to spot when its a problem. However it is not trivial to test for
(in terms of time and effort). I know 10 is wrong and so do you. If you
don't I am curious why I see so many posts from you saying, "Your
estimates are off, what is your default_statistics_target?" with yet
even more responses saying, "Uhh 10." 


Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake