Re: Should we automatically run duplicate_oids?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should we automatically run duplicate_oids? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12089.1373333612@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Should we automatically run duplicate_oids? (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should we automatically run duplicate_oids?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> writes: > ... All the same, it seems like there is a > case to be made for having this run automatically at build time, and > having the build fail on the basis of there being a duplicate This would require a rather higher standard of portability than duplicate_oids has heretofore been held to. > Sure, I ought to remember to check this anyway, but it seems > preferable to make this process more mechanical. I can point to commit > 55c1687a as a kind of precedent, where the process of running > check_keywords.pl was made to run automatically any time gram.c is > rebuilt. Note that "any time gram.c is rebuilt" is not "every build". In fact, for non-developers (tarball consumers), it's not *any* build. I'm not necessarily opposed to making this happen, but there's more legwork involved than just adding a call of the existing script in some random place in the makefiles. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: