Re: pg_dump object sorting
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump object sorting |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1208191329.4478.115.camel@dogma.ljc.laika.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_dump object sorting (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump object sorting
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 11:18 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > I have been looking at refining the sorting of objects in pg_dump to > make it take advantage of buffering and synchronised scanning, and > possibly make parallel restoration simpler and more efficient. > Synchronized scanning is explicitly disabled in pg_dump. That was a last-minute change to answer Greg Stark's complaint about dumping a clustered table: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-01/msg00987.php That hopefully won't be a permanent solution, because I think synchronized scans are useful for pg_dump. However, I'm not clear on how the pg_dump order would be able to better take advantage of synchronized scans anyway. What did you have in mind? Regards,Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: