Re: [PATCHES] Implemented current_query

On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 14:32 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Tomas Doran wrote:
> > 
> > > On 28 Mar 2008, at 17:23, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > >> Perhaps we could name it received_query() to indicate it is what the
> > >> backend received and it not necessarily the _current_ query.
> > >
> > > reveived_query() sounds like a very sane name for me, and documenting it 
> > > as such would allow you to expose the functionality without the possible 
> > > complaints...
> > 
> > client_query perhaps?
> 
> Yea, that is consistent with what we do with other functions.

How about client_request()

It's then clear that a request can be made up of many statements, which
will be executed in turn.

--  Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com 
 PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk