Re: New email list for emergency communications
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New email list for emergency communications |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1206527973.6976.9.camel@mha-laptop.clients.sollentuna.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New email list for emergency communications ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: New email list for emergency communications
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 12:01 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:31:16 +0100 > "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <adsmail@wars-nicht.de> wrote: > > > Yes, i was asked more than once by ppl using a Google talk account. > > Would be nice to have them added without adding another account in > > pidgin. > > > > Apparently I have more work to do than anyone else :P. I have zero > desire to have people contacting me from gmail, yahoo or other such > thing. I am busy enough. > > The purpose of the jabber server was to allow contributors direct > access to each other. If we open it up, that has the potential for even > more communication overload. > > If we really want a public jabber server we can do that but I would > like it to be separate from the internal jabber.postgresql server. We > could then setup the public jabber server so that it can communicate > with the private jabber server. If people want the public chat, why don't they just use gtalk or whatever public service they prefer? I don't see a reason for us to run one private and one public server. In fact, I don't see a reason for us to run a public one at all - if we were running that, we could just as well run nothing. AFAIK every reasonable IM client people would use today can easily add two jabber accounts (or more), so I don't see the problem, really. //Magnus
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: